AAIS Homepage
About Us
Membership@AAIS
Events
Training @AAIS
Publications@AAIS
AAIS Singapore Aerospace Industry Competitiveness Study 2007
Capability Development
Partners
Facilities@AAIS
Insurance@AAIS
AeroPeople on the Move
Featured Article
Press Room
Message Board
Job Vacancies
Contact Us

 
 Featured Article 
AS9110 – MRO
by Mr. Sidney Vianna

Few industry sectors require the consistent level of safety and reliability that commercial aviation does. Societal acceptance of avoidable aviation accidents will continue to decrease, even though it is statistically well established that air travel is the safest mode of transportation commercially available.

All the stakeholders in this economic sector understand the imperative need for passengers to be and feel as safe as possible when boarding an aircraft. Historically, around the world, regulatory agencies, such as the Federal Aviation Administration – FAA - have been established to oversee and regulate organizations involved with all the aspects and facets associated with flight safety. One of the most important, influential and visible stakeholders, involved in flight safety, are the so called “repair stations”. Repair stations vary tremendously in size and scope of activities. Some large repair stations provide the daily work necessary to keep an airline’s fleet operating. Others perform substantial maintenance, which might include more thorough inspection and repairs on airframes and overhauls of highly complex pieces of hardware, such as aircraft engines. Some repair stations offer very specialized services for their customers such as welding, heat treating, and coating on a variety of aircraft parts. However, the vast majority of repair stations perform maintenance on components, normally remote from airports and hangars.

FAA and other National Aviation Authorities (NAA) oversight of certified repair stations require a tremendous amount of resources, centered around personnel with a high degree of specialized knowledge about manufacturing and repair processes, material technology, regulations, quality control techniques and much more. It is a well known fact that, like many other federal agencies, the FAA’s budget is limited and the Agency is always under public and congressional scrutiny especially during the aftermaths of aviation accidents.

In a couple of reports published in 2003 and 2005, the Department of Transportation through the Office of the Inspector General (DOT IG) expressed concerns about the FAA’s oversight of the contract maintenance industry and stated that the agency’s oversight is currently insufficient for the amount of work independent repair stations perform for airlines[1][1] . The FAA has responded to these findings by, amongst other things, introducing a risk-based inspection program that identifies those repair stations doing the most work for airlines and monitoring their operations more closely. At present, it is estimated that the FAA has certified close to 4,600 domestic and 650 foreign repair stations. However, in addition to the FAA certified repair stations, a growing number of non-certificated repair stations are performing safety critical work, according to a recent report issued by the same Office of Inspector General from the US Department of Transportation[2][2]. By definition, the work performed by these non-certificated repair stations is not overseen by the FAA inspectors. Even though the work performed in such non-certificated stations must be performed by FAA certified mechanics and inspected by FAA certified inspectors, there is a dramatic difference between the regulatory requirements for certified and non-certified stations. See table 1.

Table 1
Requirement
Certificated Repair Station Non-Certificated Facility
FAA Inspections
Annual inspection required
No requirement
Quality Control
Systems
Must establish and maintain
a quality control system
that ensures that repairs
performed by the facility or
a subcontractor are in
compliance with regulations
No requirement
Reporting Failures,
Malfunctions
and Defects
Must report failures,
malfunctions and
defects to FAA within
96 hours of discovery
No requirement
Personnel
Must have designated
supervisors, inspectors
and return to service personnel 
No requirement
Training Program Required starting April 2006 No requirement
Facilities and Housing
If authorized to perform
airframe repairs, must have
facilities large enough to house
the aircraft they are authorized
to repair 
No requirement

About the author: Sidney Vianna is the Director of Aviation, Space & Defense Certification Services for DNV Certification, a leading International Certification/Registration Body. He is a non-voting member of the Registration Management Committee with the Americas Aerospace Quality Group. He is also the District Manager in the US and Canada West Coast.

Article Reproduced with Permission from Quality Digest

by Eugene M. Barker

Representing the first international effort to formulate a quality management system standard for the aerospace industry, the two-year-old AS9100 is beginning to show its long-term value. The standard supplements ISO 9001 by addressing the additional expectations of the aerospace industry. Already, reports along this complicated manufacturing chain attest to?among other benefits?AS9100's contribution to more consistent verification methods and fewer verification audits.

 Initially released in October 1999 by the Society of Automotive Engineers in the Americas and the European Association of Aerospace Industries in Europe, and shortly thereafter by standards organizations in Japan and Asia, AS9100 was a cooperative effort of the International Aerospace Quality Group. As such, it combines and harmonizes requirements outlined in the SAE's AS9000 and Europe's prEN9000-1 standards. Recently, AS9100 was revised to align with ISO 9001:2000.

Separating "whats" from "how tos"

 AS9100 defines additional areas within an aerospace quality management system that must be addressed when implementing an ISO 9001:2000-based quality system. Typically, these requirements are included within robust aerospace quality systems. The industry experts who wrote the standard and the representatives who approved it all agree that these additions are essential to ensure product, process and service safety and quality.

 Although the standard outlines industry "whats" for a quality management system, the "how tos" were deliberately left out and remain the system designers' responsibility. This reflects the AS9100 writing team's, and my, belief that how-to information stifles continuous improvement.

 All quality systems must be designed to meet the specific needs of the users. And although AS9100 identifies areas to address within the aerospace industry, system designers are encouraged to first establish a robust quality system that's both effective and efficient. This system should be a holistic entity with practices spanning multiple functions and processes within the business.

 For example, regulatory requirements are critical functions within the industry. The requirements within AS9100 are complementary to contractual and applicable law and regulations. Those implementing a quality system compliant with AS9100 must ensure that the additional requirements of their customers, regulatory agencies (such as the FAA and the JAA) and local, state and national laws are also referenced within the system's documentation.

Full article

About the author

Eugene M. Barker is a technical fellow at The Boeing Co. responsible for quality industry association interfaces. He led the industry writing team that drafted SAE AS9000 and chaired both Working Group 11 of ISO TC20 and the International Aerospace Quality Group that developed AS/EN9100. Barker is also a fellow of the American Society for Quality, a member of the Registrar Accreditation Board board of directors and a founding member of the IAQG.

 E-mail Barker at ebarker@qualitydigest.com . Letters to the editor regarding this article can be e-mailed to letters@qualitydigest.com


Sign Guest Book  View Guest Book 
Steering Singapore as the Global Aerospace Hub

Association of Aerospace Industries (Singapore)

1 Changi Business Park Ave 1
#03-03, Ultro Building

Singapore 486058
Phone: +65 6787 5227
Email: events@aais.org.sg

©2007 Association of Aerospace Industries (Singapore). All rights reserved.

Powered by iStores.com
   a division of Cardaccept.com provider of credit card processing

Click Here to view ASX 2011 brochure

A Quality magazine
published by the AAIS

Subscribe TODAY!

Click here for advertising information

Are you an overseas company wanting to be seen? The
International AeroPartners' Profiler

is the right platform for you!

Click here for enquiries.

 Channel NewsAsia Business News